As metropolis leaders await the launch of redistricting information, questions on information high quality are on the prime of thoughts. The Census Bureau supplies two mechanisms for addressing potential errors: the Rely Query Decision (CQR) course of and the Inhabitants Estimates Problem course of.
To make clear these two processes, we spoke to the specialists: Denice Ross, Senior Fellow on the Nationwide Convention on Citizenship, and a Fellow on the Beeck Heart for Social Impression and Innovation; Christopher Dick, previously of the Census Bureau’s Inhabitants Estimate program and founding father of Demographic Analytics Advisors; and Joe Salvo, former Chief Demographer on the New York Metropolis Division of Metropolis Planning, at present on the Nationwide Convention on Citizenship.
Key takeaways embrace:
- CQR is proscribed to correcting geographic and information processing errors, and solely impacts the bottom for inhabitants estimates going ahead. It doesn’t have an effect on redistricting and apportionment. Traditionally, adjustments on account of CQR have been very small.
- The affect of the pandemic and truncated non-response follow-up (NRFU) course of was particularly acute for group quarters, similar to prisons and nursing houses. This is among the key factors in a brand new proposal to broaden the scope of CQR, which may enable cities to present administrative data to the Census Bureau. Cities ought to begin compiling documentation now in preparation for attainable growth of the CQR course of.
- Native leaders can get entangled by making ready to weigh in earlier than the Census Bureau units the rules for Inhabitants Estimate Challenges and weigh in on the Federal Register Discover and acquire supplemental information and methodologies upfront of a attainable problem.
Unique occasion date: July 15, 2021